The standard of proof in disciplinary proceedings the. Apart from the provisions of the constitution of the republic of south africa, 1996, and the provisions of the common law. Beyond reasonable doubt a paradox of ideological immunity1. This is an advance summary of a forthcoming entry in the encyclopedia of law. In south africa, as in most adversarial legal systems, the standard of evidence required to validate a criminal conviction is proof beyond a reasonable doubt. Presumption of innocence burden of proof in cases without an affirmative defense proof beyond a reasonabl e doubt we now turn to the fundamental principles of our law that apply in all criminal trialsthe presumption of innocence, the burden of proof, and the requirement of proof beyond a reasonable doubt. In south africa the application of the law of evidence and the manner in.
I am honoured to submit to you in terms of section 71 of the south african law commission act, 1973 act 19 of 1973, for your consideration the commissions report on the application of the bill of rights to criminal procedure, criminal law, the law of evidence and sentencing. According to contemporary south african criminal theory, a person. Strauss, south africa, in international encyclopaedia of laws 4558 herman nys ed. The civil standard of proof is proof on a balance of probabilities. It was the duty of the state to prove its case beyond any reasonable doubt and not for the accused to prove his innocence by coming up with explanations as to why he is an accused. Presumption of innocence burden of proof in cases without. The evidence in a particular case may call for a cautionary approach, but that is a far cry from the application of a general cautionary rule. Is the burden discharged on the balance of probabilities or upon proof of reasonable probability sufficient to create a reasonable doubt in the mind of the judge. Amongst the litany of fair trial rights that exist in south african criminal and procedural law is the presumption of innocence.
Generally a person is not required to answer police questions. Johannesburg the twentyyear sentence for three counts of culpable homicide, reckless driving and driving under the influence handed down by magistrate anand maharaj to mr kriesen moodley in the durban regional court recently is welcomed by justice project south africa. If reasonable doubt remains, the accused must be acquitted. Wonderful tale of murder and intrigue in a south nottinghamshire village. If the assessors agree on a fact, and the judge disagrees, the assessors can overrule the judge. Nkuna v s a182016 2018 zalmpphc 21 11 may 2018 saflii.
Hoffman feb 23, 2017 for the past several months, book riot has been getting a lot of requests for recommendations for books explaining why our political and legal systems are the way they are. The criminal standard is proof beyond a reasonable doubt. Here are definitions of some common law words or terms related to beyond reasonable doubt that may assist you in your viewing of this site. Check out the new look and enjoy easier access to your favorite features. Degree of proof required to find someone guilty of a crime.
The reasonable doubt that the law gives the accused is not a weak or a slight doubt, but a strong and wellfounded doubt as to the truth of the charge. Beyond a reasonable doubt is a legal standard of proof required to validate a criminal conviction in most adversarial legal systems. Prior to the appellate division judgment handed down in the chretien case south african law relating to the defence of intoxication followed the english specific intent rule. Under the presumption of innocence, the legal burden of proof is thus on the prosecution, which must present compelling evidence to the trier of fact a judge or a jury. Court the high court in whose jurisdiction the missing person was domiciled. This book has been written by the national prosecuting. Intention in south african criminal law is widely defined to include dolus.
Accuracy of speedmeasuring device on roads questioned. Newman, beyond reasonable doubt, 1993 68 new york university law. Criminal law amendment act sexual offences and related matters 32 of 2007, namely rape read with the provisions of sections 51 and or 52 and schedule 2 of the criminal law amendment act 105 of 1997, as amended and section 94 of the criminal. On the day in question, some children were outside a. Acts of the parliament of south africa sister projects. The south african constitution does not guarantee for anyone the right to be presumed innocent by ordinary citizens until proven guilty in a court of law. The sources of south african criminal law are to be found in the common law, in case law and in legislation. On the day in question, some children were outside a hut. Twentyyear sentence for road killer welcomed justice. It is a higher standard of proof than the balance of probabilities commonly used in civil matters and is usually therefore reserved for criminal matters where what is at stake e. The presumption of innocence obliges the state to show guilt beyond a reasonable doubt in order for an accused to be convicted. Academic journal article south african journal of philosophy. It was also submitted that the appellant was neither pointed out nor identified by the witnesses during the identification parade. A reasonable man tells the story of a city lawyer who comes across the case of a herdboy from remote, rural zululand, who has killed a one year old baby in the mistaken belief that he was killing an evil spirit, known throughout southern africa as the tikoloshe.
The south african law of evidence forms part of the adjectival or procedural law of that country. Intoxication as a multiple defence in south african. In some cases the burden of proof of a particular defence such as insanity may be on the defendant, but then the defence need only be proved on the balance of probabilities,and not beyond a reasonable doubt, as the prosecution must do right to remain silent. Burden is on the state to prove the guilt of an accused beyond reasonable doubt, no more and no less.
A conviction can not possibly be sustained unless the judicial officer entertains a belief in the truth of the criminal complainant, but the fact that such credence is given to the testimony does not mean that conviction must necessarily ensue. The appellant stated that both sergeant malatji, who made entries in the cell book regarding visits to the cells on the night. Crucial evidence cassie hardman legal thriller book 1. This case proves beyond any reasonable doubt that when judicial officers are presented with. Common law presumption statutory presumption of of death.
Find a definition of beyond reasonable doubt in the law dictionary. It is a general rule of south african criminal law that an accuseds unlawful conduct and. South african law which negates criminal responsibility. No, the constitution does not guarantee a right to be presumed. A court may only convict the accused if it is convinced beyond reasonable doubt that she. The law recognises that persons suffering from insanity cannot be sanctioned in the same way as. We have spoken extensively on the changing regulatory environment. Guide to being tried for murder in south africa 16 may 2014 groundup staff palace of justice, pretoria. If the version of the appellant is reasonably possibly true, he must.
It is trite law that the onus rests on the state to prove the guilt of the accused beyond reasonable doubt. If the state proves that a person committed the crime beyond a reasonable doubt, then a judge or magistrate can send that person to prison or give the person a fine. This means that the courts must be alive to the danger of relying on the evidence of only. This right provides that an accused person is presumed to be innocent until proven guilty. Guide to being tried for murder in south africa groundup. Medical malpractice and compensation in south africa. The prosecution would still retain the burden of proof to prove the defendants guilt beyond a reasonable doubt, but the burden of production would shift to the defendant to prove by a. According to the recent osti briefcase, the official communique of osti, mr r the insured was arrested on a suspected murder charge.
The prosecution must in most cases prove that the accused is guilty beyond reasonable doubt. The start of a thrilling new legal series beyond reasonable. This dissertation deals with the constitutionality of the onus of proof in cases. The requirement in such a case is, as always, proof of guilt beyond reasonable doubt, and to assist the courts in determining whether the onus is discharged they have developed a rule of practice that requires the evidence of a single witness to be approached with special caution rex v mokoena, 1956 3 sa 81 ad 85, 86. Saying something is proven on a balance of probabilities means that it is more likely than not to have occurred. Police official must investigate the circumstances of the death and report the matter to the magistrate of the district concerned.
It must be proved, beyond any reasonable doubt, that the accused committed some. Articles examine relevant court cases, judgments and regulatory developments in financial crimes, violent crimes, property crimes and other statutory offenses. The chapter critically evaluates the concepts of beyond a reasonable doubt and. The issue of guilt on a balance of probabilities vs guilt beyond reasonable doubt was a key issue. This short capsule explains why the crown has to prove guilt beyond a reasonable doubt, what that term means, and what happens when the accused has a. The supreme court of appeal of south africa judgment not. Reasonable doubt is a short novella that needs to be devoured and adored.
Wikipedia article, wikidata item the terrorism act no. The duty to prove the guilt ofthe accused beyond a reasonable doubt extends to. Its about a girl called alyssa and a high profile lawyer who has a penchant for blonde curvy women. These instructions guided the jury when it found petitioner guilty of murder and again at the sentencing hearing when it found beyond a reasonable doubt the existence of two statutory. South africa the presumption of innocence is derived from the centuriesold principle of english law. The south african law commission was established by the south african law. Hope suggests that subsection 1 should read an entry in any book of. If, after reading jacques pauws recently published book, the. This topic includes articles, analyses and insights relating to both national and international criminal law. Proof beyond reasonable doubt does not mean proof beyond the.
Ideology criticism, like scepticism, calls into question the objective or justified. On a balance of probabilities guilty or not guilty. Terrorism act, 1967 wikisource, the free online library. Applicable law common law inquests act 58 of 1959 aviation act 74 of 1962. What does proof on a balance of probabilities mean. But because a person has a right to be innocent until proven guilty, the osti rightly argued that proving guilt on a balance of probabilities and proving guilt beyond reasonable doubt could not be separated in this particular case. The only issue in dispute is whether the state has proved beyond reasonable doubt that she was penetrated, and thus raped, by the accused. The standard of evidence in south africa is proof beyond reasonable doubt. Intoxication as a multiple defence in south african criminal law. Search the worlds most comprehensive index of fulltext books. At the conclusion of all the evidence, the appellant was convicted as. In south africa, any person charged with a crime has the right to. Crimen injuria is a crime under south african common law. The required standard of proof beyond reasonable doubt was profoundly dealt with in the case of s v makanyanga 1996 2 zlr 231 when the court observed that.
The burden of proof on defendants in criminal cases requires clarification because there are. One of the key directions given to juries in criminal trials across australia is to remind them of the accuseds right to be presumed innocent of the charge, and only to be convicted if the jury has been persuaded beyond a reasonable doubt. It also gave the police the power to detain people indefinitely, incommunicado and without a trial or court appearance. Criminal law on intoxication as it exists in south africa is a valid legal defense that an accused can use against criminal charges based on mental capacity, conduct and particularly, intention.
12 86 437 1045 838 1104 942 1522 888 1340 625 1072 724 1542 494 238 1105 833 731 1610 1561 1260 507 464 233 1352 1611 653 167 902 50 1115 908 845 949 208 1116 720 886 190 1183 691